Political Term
Monday, 15 December 2014
Ugandan Homophobia.
The legislative proposal would broaden the criminalisation of same-sex relations in Uganda domestically, and further includes provisions for Ugandans who engage in same-sex relations outside of Uganda, asserting that they may be extradited for punishment back to Uganda, and includes penalties for individuals, companies, media organisations, or non-governmental organisations that know of gay people or support LGBT rights.
The private member's bill was submitted by Member of Parliament David Bahati on 14 October 2009. Same-sex relationships are currently illegal in Uganda—as they are in many sub-Saharan African countries—punishable by incarceration in prison for up to 14 years. A special motion to introduce the legislation was passed a month after a two-day conference was held in which three American Christians asserted that homosexuality is a direct threat to the cohesion of African families. Several sources have noted endemic homophobia in Uganda has been exacerbated by the bill and the associated discussions about it.
On 1 August 2014, the Constitutional Court of Uganda ruled the law invalid.
I think that this is disqusting, love is not a crime.
The most horrific
I really enjoyed watching the other peices as well as it was interesting seeing the same peice but done in 3 completley different ways. I loved Wills class as i think they really captured the point of veiw of the public and how disinterested they were in such sensitive subjects and how interested they were in things such as the x factor and celebritys. I think that this really did the peice justice and how serious the C's and D's were and how jokey the A's and B's were. I also really enjoyed Sarah's group and liked their incorperation of music and the 'audition space', it was completely different to the others, which was quite refreshing.
I think that our final peice went really well and we had the perfect balance of energy and seriousness for the performance. At the beginnning of the show, we all had to perform individual group protests, this was also really good as it showed contrast to the laughter of the performance to the serious of those situations (attached). We performed a protest about homophobia in Uganda, i already knew about this story and knew how serious it was. we used the use of silence, we didnt talk throughout until we all individually told our stories. i think it was effective as we were all really aggressive with one another. I liked the promenade aspect of it aswell, as they went around the space and witnessed all of the protests/peices and then went into the space and were able to see a more relaxed peice.
By using Brecht’s different techniques over the term, they helped me develop a deeper understanding of what it really means to present a piece of political theatre to an audience. Brecht believed a piece of political theatre should leave the audience asking questions about themselves, what they just saw and society itself – I feel we definitely managed to achieve this successfully and effectively and that we not only left an impact on those viewing the performance, but on us, the actors, as well. I have thoroughly enjoyed this political term and studying both “The Most Horrific” and Brecht’s techniques. I have learnt many different skills over this term which I have never had the chance to develop before and I have gained new knowledge and experience that I will definitely use in further pieces and their development.
Gestus
This is Brecht's term for that which expresses basic human attitudes - not merely “gesture” but all signs of social relations: department, intonation, facial expression. The Stanislavskian actor is to work at identifying with the character he or she portrays. The Brechtian actor is to work at expressing social attitudes in clear and stylized ways. So, when Shen-Te becomes Shui-Ta, she moves in a different manner. Brecht wished to embody the “Gestus” in the dialogue - as if to compel the right stance, movement and intonation. By subtle use of rhythm pause, parallelism and counterpointing, Brecht creates a “gestic” language.
The songs are yet more clearly “gestic”. As street singers make clear their attitudes with overt, grand but simple gestures, so, in delivering songs, the Brechtian actor aims to produce clarity in expressing a basic attitude, such as despair, defiance or submission.
Instead of the seamless continuity of the naturalistic theatre, the illusion of natural disorder, Brecht wishes to break up the story into distinct episodes, each of which presents, in a clear and ordered manner, a central basic action. All that appears in the scene is designed to show the significance of the basic “Gestus”. We see how this works in Mother Courage. Each scene is prefaced by a caption telling the audience what is to be the important event, in such a way as to suggest the proper attitude for the audience to adopt to it - for instance (Scene 3): “She manages to save her daughter, likewise her covered cart, but her honest son is killed.”
When we performed this scene from Mother Courage, we used many Brecht techniques, such as holding up a sign at the beggining, stating where we were and when it was. We also used things such as using one actor to play multiple characters. We really enjoyed performing this scene as we had been taken out of the natrulistic acting world, and we could be as over the top as we wanted (obvioulsy with boundaries).
Tuesday, 2 December 2014
Protest evaluation
Monday, 17 November 2014
My strongest political view
Source: UNICEF 2014
- Somalia (98%)
- Gambia (56%)
- Mauritania (54%)
- Guinea (46%)
- Sudan (37%)
- Eritrea (33%)
- Ethiopia (24%)
- Egypt (24%)
- Senegal (18%)
- Nigeria (17%)
- Yemen (15%)
- Burkina Faso (13%)
- Sierra Leone (13%)
- Côte d'Ivoire (10%)
- Uganda (1%)
- Central African Republic(1%)
- Ghana (1%)
- Togo (0.4%)
- Benin (0.3%)
- ^ These are the percentages of girls aged 0-14 get their genitalia removed, with no pain relif, in each of these country's.
- It makes me feel utterly I'll to think that these poor little girls have to go through this day in, day out. FGM has been happening in these country's, and more, for generations. It is estimated that around 125 million young females have had to suffer this ridiculous procedure.
The procedures differ according to the ethnic group. They include removal of the clitoral hood and clitoris, and in the most severe form (known asinfibulation) removal of the inner andouter labia and closure of the vulva; in this last procedure, a small hole is left for the passage of urine and menstrual blood, and the vagina is opened for intercourse and childbirth. Health effects depend on the procedure, but can include recurrent infections, chronic pain, cysts, an inability to get pregnant, complications during childbirth and fatal bleeding. There are no known health benefits.
The practice is rooted in gender inequality, attempts to control women's sexuality, and ideas about purity, modesty and aesthetics. It is initiated and usually carried out by women, who see it as a source of honour, and who fear that failing to have their daughters and granddaughters cut will expose the girls to social exclusion. Over 125 million women and girls have experienced FGM in the 29 countries in which it is concentrated.Over eight million have been infibulated, a practice found largely in Djibouti, Eritrea, Somalia and Sudan.
One of my aims in life is to visit these country's and not only give the people who are carrying out this disgrace a peice of my mind, but also setting up and funding for safe houses for women and children who have had it done and still suffer, mothers who don't want their children to have to go through what they did, and also trying to prevent it as much as I can! I saw this in 2012, when it was first aired on Channel 4, it is very interesting.
http://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-day-i-will-never-forget


